Save the Earth Mods (
theearth) wrote in
saveyourselves2013-05-31 04:23 pm
Entry tags:
MAY ACTIVITY CHECK
Activity check will remain open until June 7th. Only activity from May 1st onwards will be acceptable.
Although again, it is impossible for any character to fail by insufficient activity this month's round, all players accepted before this announcement and who are not on hiatus must reply by/on June 7th or be removed from the game.
It is not necessary to fill out the below form. A note simply stating your name and the character(s) played is acceptable. This will be the ordinary procedure for any character accepted during the activity cycle in the future. However, this is the last time before real-deal activity checking begins, so the more full responses we receive the better; results will be used to gauge player comfort with the current requirements. If you do fill out the form, please do so as if your place in the game depended on it, to get more accurate results.
Player Section
Paste once.
Activity Section
Paste once per character.
Note: Threads do not have to be a set length to count, but it must be evident that some work/thought was put into them. A network-based thread of many brief comments may hold the same weight as a shorter one with a higher word count per comment. In other words, don't sweat it, though if you feel four threads is not enough, you may provide up to two more, both of which can be with a character who is the same as in one of the first four linked threads.
Feedback
Optional.
Thanks for being in the game!
Although again, it is impossible for any character to fail by insufficient activity this month's round, all players accepted before this announcement and who are not on hiatus must reply by/on June 7th or be removed from the game.
It is not necessary to fill out the below form. A note simply stating your name and the character(s) played is acceptable. This will be the ordinary procedure for any character accepted during the activity cycle in the future. However, this is the last time before real-deal activity checking begins, so the more full responses we receive the better; results will be used to gauge player comfort with the current requirements. If you do fill out the form, please do so as if your place in the game depended on it, to get more accurate results.
Player Section
Paste once.
Activity Section
Paste once per character.
Note: Threads do not have to be a set length to count, but it must be evident that some work/thought was put into them. A network-based thread of many brief comments may hold the same weight as a shorter one with a higher word count per comment. In other words, don't sweat it, though if you feel four threads is not enough, you may provide up to two more, both of which can be with a character who is the same as in one of the first four linked threads.
Feedback
Optional.
Thanks for being in the game!
no subject
Name: Gail
Contact: PM this journal, AIM throughoblivion
Character: Randolph Lyall
Character Journal:
Plot Relevant Actions: Visiting the art gallery with the statues and discussing them on the network, getting haunted, setting up the Numbers Club at the high school, and following the kiddos to the mine to bumble around.
Thread 1: Thread with Chris/Starscream and Elian/Vector Prime | 5/7
Thread 2: Thread with Julien/Yuuya | 5/7
Thread 3: Thread with Romsca | 5/9
Thread 4: Thread with Fay/Fai | 5/30
Character: Arhu/Gomez
Character Journal:
Plot Relevant Actions: He's only just gotten on the network and revealed himself to his human. Nothing more plot-related than that yet.
Thread 1: Thread with Alex | 5/19
Thread 2: Thread with Colette | 5/19
Thread 3: Thread with Regina/Bluefur | 5/20
Thread 4: Thread with Alex, Arthur, and Cinderella | 5/27
How did you find meeting these requirements?: Way easier for Lyall than for Arhu.
How quickly would you say it took you to reach the requirements? Not long, though I was still a little uncertain whether ones from the same post count. I used them, since without Arhu wouldn't have met AC, but it's sitll a little unclear.
General thoughts on the activity check/questions/etc.: I'm still of the opinion that clarity is better than not, in general.
no subject
no subject